LANGUAGE SWITCHER
Flat Q
齐宅
2026
#103
项目：Flat Q
设计：一门社
类型：住宅
地址：成都D10
面积：220㎡
年份：2026
定制：MDL全案定制
摄影：李斌
Project: Flat Q
Design: amass studio
Type: Residential
Location: Chengdu D10
Area: 220㎡
Year: 2026
Custom Millwork: MDL Whole-House Customization
Photography: Li Bin
Flat Q 是对典型豪宅精装房的一次改造。这样的空间往往在交付时已经被完整定义：隔墙清晰、功能分区明确、材料标准统一。它在市场逻辑下是成熟的、稳定的。
项目业主来自一位长期合作的商业客户。他希望这个家不要沿用常规“豪宅”的表达方式，而是重新思考居住本身。与其叠加装饰，不如重新讨论空间的起点。
在进入设计之前，我们提出了几个问题：
家是否需要这么多隔墙？是否需要以“全屋定制”作为默认解法？当一套精装住宅已经完成装修，设计究竟是拆除、添置，还是保留？
客户Q愿意与我们一起面对这些问题。一方面是一种反叛的精神，但更多的是一种不轻易接受现成答案的态度，让空间的决定权真正回到居住者手上。
我们最终选择重组空间边界。
原有部分隔墙被拆除，新的秩序由一套立柱系统建立。立柱从顶面锚固落下，形成连续的骨架。横向隔板、龙门架、洞洞板与不同形式的层板被嵌入其中，储物、展示、衣物收纳、操作台等功能整合进同一体系。
空间不再依赖实体墙体完成分隔。界面变得轻，视线可以穿透，光线在结构之间流动。系统既承担边界的角色，也容纳日常物品。它更接近家具尺度的建筑，而非传统柜体。
入户区域像是一道被拉长的家具，而不是一个被封闭的门厅。它一侧组织鞋帽、换衣、洗手台，另一侧引导进入客厅与餐厨。业主回家后可以在此完成洗净与转换，再进入生活区域。
立柱系统向内部延伸。在客厅，它承担电视界面与开放储物；在书房，它成为工作与阅读的框架；在卧室区域，它进入衣帽间，重新梳理衣物与收纳的秩序。功能嵌入结构之中，空间保持连续。
顶面处理同样回到建筑本身。原有吊顶被拆除，混凝土结构暴露出来。梁与管线被重新梳理，结构关系得以显现。墙面被削减，构造成为空间的基础秩序。精装所带来的完成感被弱化，建筑的骨架重新成为主角。
Flat Q 并没有通过材料的堆叠去强化“豪宅”的印象。它更像一次对精装住宅逻辑的反思。拆除与添置被重新排序，结构成为居住的起点。
这是我们第一次尝试住宅设计。
在商业空间设计中，我们习惯表达一种立场；那么在住宅里，为什么不能呢？“豪宅”未必等于豪华。
我们逐渐意识到，家更需要的是一副可以长期使用的骨架。立柱系统只是起点，真正的秩序会在日常生活中慢慢生成。
也许这里所谓的“豪宅”，说到底，是允许居住者重新定义空间的可能吧。
项目业主来自一位长期合作的商业客户。他希望这个家不要沿用常规“豪宅”的表达方式，而是重新思考居住本身。与其叠加装饰，不如重新讨论空间的起点。
在进入设计之前，我们提出了几个问题：
家是否需要这么多隔墙？是否需要以“全屋定制”作为默认解法？当一套精装住宅已经完成装修，设计究竟是拆除、添置，还是保留？
客户Q愿意与我们一起面对这些问题。一方面是一种反叛的精神，但更多的是一种不轻易接受现成答案的态度，让空间的决定权真正回到居住者手上。
我们最终选择重组空间边界。
原有部分隔墙被拆除，新的秩序由一套立柱系统建立。立柱从顶面锚固落下，形成连续的骨架。横向隔板、龙门架、洞洞板与不同形式的层板被嵌入其中，储物、展示、衣物收纳、操作台等功能整合进同一体系。
空间不再依赖实体墙体完成分隔。界面变得轻，视线可以穿透，光线在结构之间流动。系统既承担边界的角色，也容纳日常物品。它更接近家具尺度的建筑，而非传统柜体。
入户区域像是一道被拉长的家具，而不是一个被封闭的门厅。它一侧组织鞋帽、换衣、洗手台，另一侧引导进入客厅与餐厨。业主回家后可以在此完成洗净与转换，再进入生活区域。
立柱系统向内部延伸。在客厅，它承担电视界面与开放储物；在书房，它成为工作与阅读的框架；在卧室区域，它进入衣帽间，重新梳理衣物与收纳的秩序。功能嵌入结构之中，空间保持连续。
顶面处理同样回到建筑本身。原有吊顶被拆除，混凝土结构暴露出来。梁与管线被重新梳理，结构关系得以显现。墙面被削减，构造成为空间的基础秩序。精装所带来的完成感被弱化，建筑的骨架重新成为主角。
Flat Q 并没有通过材料的堆叠去强化“豪宅”的印象。它更像一次对精装住宅逻辑的反思。拆除与添置被重新排序，结构成为居住的起点。
这是我们第一次尝试住宅设计。
在商业空间设计中，我们习惯表达一种立场；那么在住宅里，为什么不能呢？“豪宅”未必等于豪华。
我们逐渐意识到，家更需要的是一副可以长期使用的骨架。立柱系统只是起点，真正的秩序会在日常生活中慢慢生成。
也许这里所谓的“豪宅”，说到底，是允许居住者重新定义空间的可能吧。
Flat Q is a renovation of a typical high-end, developer-finished apartment. Such spaces often arrive fully defined at handover: partitions are fixed, functions are clearly zoned, and material standards are uniform. Within the logic of the market, it is already complete and stable.
The homeowner came to us through a long-term commercial client. He did not want this home to follow the conventional language of a “luxury residence,” but to rethink what living itself could be. Rather than adding decoration, we chose to revisit the starting point of the space.
Before design began, we raised a few questions:
Does a home need so many walls? Should “whole-house customization” be the default solution? When a finished apartment has already been renovated, what is design—demolition, addition, or preservation?
Client Q was willing to face these questions with us. There is a rebellious spirit, but more importantly, an attitude of not accepting ready-made answers—returning the right to decide the space to the resident.
We ultimately chose to reorganize the boundaries of the space.
Some of the original partitions were removed, and a new order was established through a column system. Anchored from the ceiling, the columns form a continuous structural frame. Horizontal shelves, portal frames, pegboards, and various types of panels are integrated into this system, bringing storage, display, wardrobe organization, and work surfaces into one unified framework.
The space no longer relies on solid walls for separation. Interfaces become lighter; sightlines pass through; light flows between structures. The system defines boundaries while holding everyday objects. It is closer to architecture at the scale of furniture, rather than conventional cabinetry.
The entry zone becomes an elongated piece of furniture rather than an enclosed foyer. One side organizes shoes, coats, changing, and a wash basin; the other guides you toward the living room and kitchen–dining area. Returning home, the resident can wash and transition here before entering the living space.
The column system extends inward. In the living room, it forms the TV plane and open storage; in the study, it frames work and reading; in the bedroom area, it enters the walk-in closet, reorganizing clothing and storage. Functions are embedded into structure, keeping the space continuous.
The ceiling treatment also returns to the building itself. The original dropped ceiling was removed, exposing the concrete structure. Beams and services were reorganized, allowing structural relationships to re-emerge. Wall finishes were reduced; construction becomes the underlying order of the space. The “finished” feeling typical of developer interiors is softened, and the building’s skeleton becomes the protagonist again.
Flat Q does not reinforce the impression of a “luxury residence” through layered materials. Instead, it is a reflection on the logic of developer-finished housing. Demolition and additions are re-ordered, and structure becomes the starting point of living.
This was our first attempt at residential design.
In commercial spaces, we are used to expressing a stance—so why not in a home? “Luxury residence” does not necessarily mean luxurious.
We gradually realized that what a home needs more is a durable framework that can be used over time. The column system is only the beginning; the real order will slowly emerge through everyday life.
Perhaps the so-called “luxury” here ultimately lies in allowing residents the possibility to redefine their own space.
The homeowner came to us through a long-term commercial client. He did not want this home to follow the conventional language of a “luxury residence,” but to rethink what living itself could be. Rather than adding decoration, we chose to revisit the starting point of the space.
Before design began, we raised a few questions:
Does a home need so many walls? Should “whole-house customization” be the default solution? When a finished apartment has already been renovated, what is design—demolition, addition, or preservation?
Client Q was willing to face these questions with us. There is a rebellious spirit, but more importantly, an attitude of not accepting ready-made answers—returning the right to decide the space to the resident.
We ultimately chose to reorganize the boundaries of the space.
Some of the original partitions were removed, and a new order was established through a column system. Anchored from the ceiling, the columns form a continuous structural frame. Horizontal shelves, portal frames, pegboards, and various types of panels are integrated into this system, bringing storage, display, wardrobe organization, and work surfaces into one unified framework.
The space no longer relies on solid walls for separation. Interfaces become lighter; sightlines pass through; light flows between structures. The system defines boundaries while holding everyday objects. It is closer to architecture at the scale of furniture, rather than conventional cabinetry.
The entry zone becomes an elongated piece of furniture rather than an enclosed foyer. One side organizes shoes, coats, changing, and a wash basin; the other guides you toward the living room and kitchen–dining area. Returning home, the resident can wash and transition here before entering the living space.
The column system extends inward. In the living room, it forms the TV plane and open storage; in the study, it frames work and reading; in the bedroom area, it enters the walk-in closet, reorganizing clothing and storage. Functions are embedded into structure, keeping the space continuous.
The ceiling treatment also returns to the building itself. The original dropped ceiling was removed, exposing the concrete structure. Beams and services were reorganized, allowing structural relationships to re-emerge. Wall finishes were reduced; construction becomes the underlying order of the space. The “finished” feeling typical of developer interiors is softened, and the building’s skeleton becomes the protagonist again.
Flat Q does not reinforce the impression of a “luxury residence” through layered materials. Instead, it is a reflection on the logic of developer-finished housing. Demolition and additions are re-ordered, and structure becomes the starting point of living.
This was our first attempt at residential design.
In commercial spaces, we are used to expressing a stance—so why not in a home? “Luxury residence” does not necessarily mean luxurious.
We gradually realized that what a home needs more is a durable framework that can be used over time. The column system is only the beginning; the real order will slowly emerge through everyday life.
Perhaps the so-called “luxury” here ultimately lies in allowing residents the possibility to redefine their own space.
原有精装房照片 Original Developer-Finished Interior Photos
拆除中照片纪录 Demolition Process Documentation